It’s a shame that so many people just want to get to a high status through taking things from others as to have as much resource as possible. It’s a shame when this kind of person accoounts for majority of the upper or middle class. It;s especially a shame when this kind of person want to start a company—because the nature of starting a company is against their motivation. That is to say, when you start a company you are producing a product and give it to others. You are making other people’s life better. This is against the intuative method of the majority people to achieve success that you can make it by taking resource from others, which, unfortunatly, is buried deep in their mind.
The resource in this world is limited. The hardware resource is needless to say. Like the food. the water, the medical resource. The “software” resource, which is more covert, like the education resource, the job oppotunity, the people you meet with, the activity you attend, is also very limited.
The people always take pride in taking more software resources than others and treat it as a success symbol. I feel disgusting about this. Of course, people also take pride in taking more hardware resource. But there are nuances between these two categories.
The first category is the healthy way to take resouces. It comforms to the framework of justice. That is, you take because you pay for others.
The second category comforms to the framework of vanity and selfishness. That is, you take things from others for you doing nothing but you take it for granted and look down on those who don’t. Under this framework, the reason you take it for granted is that you think you are worth. You think you are superior. And you take pride in being superior. But unfortunately, all of these, are just illusory images only existing in people‘s mind. How do you prove that you are more worth, are more superior. Since all of the animals are created equal, why are some animals more equal? And this egotistical mindset is exactly the source of injustice.
(to be continued,,)
The method you can prove you are more equal and superior. There doesn’t exist a consensus. Or that will be intellectual authoritarianism. So nobody is more superior than others in a whole. But everybody is better at some specific niche facing a specific audience. Because everybody has their own opinions and thus has their own judgement of who at what specific aspect is more superior. The allocation of resource based on superiority will never work. I mean work based on justice. The only justice way is the consensus of our economy system. You get what you pay.